Data Layers

  Main Page
.. .. ..
  Abstract
.
  Introduction
.
  Objectives
.
  Data Layers
.
  Methodology
.
  Products
.
  Web Maps
.
  Appendix
.
  Contact Info
.
  Acknowledgments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Data Collected for the Source Water Assessment

One of the challenges facing the source water assessment team was the determination and collection of the GIS data required for the project. All of the GIS data collected for the project were converted into seamless, statewide coverages for ease of map production and analysis within the GIS software. The only exception to this method was the Digital Elevation Model (DEM). The DEM coverage for the state was roughly divided into quarters to allow for faster processing. The GIS data considered pertinent to the source water susceptibility methodology include:

Land Use/Land Cover (LULC)

FGDC Metadata

Source: Arkansas GAP Analysis Project

Data Format: Raster (30m resolution)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies (CAST)

Description: The Arkansas GAP Analysis project was completed in 1996 by the Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies. The result of this project was a Statewide, LANDSAT image classification of the land cover and vegetation classes found within Arkansas. These data represent the most current and complete land use characteristics for the study area. Therefore, the resulting land cover classification was re-classed into the appropriate land cover classes for the source water assessment.

Soils

FGDC Metadata

Source: STATSGO; modified by CAST

Data Format: Raster (30m resolution)

Scale: 1:250,000

Source Agency: NRCS (Fort Worth, TX); CAST

Description: The Arkansas STATSGO General Soil map contains 71 soil map units. Each of these general map units are comprised of approximately 21 categories and 7 layers that further describe the soils that make up the entire unit. Those categories and layers were averaged for each soil unit in order to obtain a single value for the assessment of Soil Permeability and Depth-to-Bedrock, which were required attributes for the Source Water Assessment.

Elevation

FGDC Metadata

Source: USGS Digital Elevation Model (DEM)

Data Format: Raster (30m resolution)

Scale: 1:24,000

Source Agency: United States Geological Survey (Little Rock, AR)

Description: The United States Geological Survey in Little Rock were responsible for obtaining all of the most current 7.5' minute Digital Elevation Models (DEM) for the study area and patching them together with ArcInfo (GRID). In those areas where a 7.5-minute DEM quadrangle had not been completed for Arkansas, the 80m data from the NIMA organization were used and then re-sampled to 30m resolution to match the rest of the dataset. The project participants agreed that these were the best data available at the time of the project.

Slope

FGDC Metadata

Source: Calculated from the DEM in percent slope

Data Format: Raster (30m resolution)

Scale: 1:24,000

Source Agency: United States Geological Survey (Little Rock, AR)

Description: The slope map was derived from the DEM data generated for the study area. The slope ranges are in percent slope and were determined by the source water assessment team. The ranges of percent slope are: ( 0-5%, 6-10%, 11-15%, 15-20%, > 20%, and No Data).

Geology

FGDC Metadata

Source: USGS Geologic Map of Arkansas; digitized by CAST

Data Format: Raster (30m resolution)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: USGS; CAST

Description: The General Geology map of Arkansas was originally compiled in 1977 by the USGS and was digitized into a GIS coverage in 1989. These data remain the only digital version of Arkansas' general geology to date. The geologic categories were reclassified into source water assessment "weighting factors" for each rock type in Arkansas. Dr. Ralph Davis of the Arkansas Water Resources Center determined these category reclassifications.

Landforms

FGDC Metadata

Source: STATSGO; modified by Arkansas Department of Health

Data Format: Vector

Scale: 1:250,000

Source Agency: NRCS (Fort Worth, TX); Arkansas Dept. of Health

Description: The Arkansas Department of Health - Engineering Section, contributed the Arkansas landform data. Lyle Godfrey and Ralph Davis were responsible for edits made to this dataset to reflect their collective, professional opinion of the general landform regions of Arkansas. The source of the original data was the STATSGO general soil map of Arkansas that had been manipulated by the Natural Resource Conservation Service in Little Rock, Arkansas.

Roads

FGDC Metadata

Source: USGS 7.5minute quad maps; modified/updated by AHTD

Data Format: Vector

Scale: 1:24,000

Source Agency: USGS, Ark. Highway and Transportation Dept.

Description: These data were obtained from the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) for use during the Arkansas source water assessment project. These data were originally digitized from USGS quadrangle maps and have since been updated and maintained by the AHTD cartographers using current black and white photography. Although these data do not contain address attribution or even street names, it was the most "spatially" accurate, complete road coverage for the state of Arkansas at the beginning of this study. The AHTD allowed the Arkansas Department of Health to use these data, free of charge, via a memorandum of understanding.

Streams

FGDC Metadata

Source: TIGER Line Files (1998)

Data Format: Vector (lines)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Description: This data layer contains all of the 1998 TIGER/Line hydrographic lines for the State of Arkansas. The file is an extract of the 1998 TIGER/Line files. These data were originally collected from the USGS Digital Line Graph data. After review by the source water team, it was determined that these data better represented the nature of the hydrology within Arkansas, than any other readily available data source; regardless of the fact that the other reviewed data were collected at a more accurate scale. The added bonus of the DLG data was the inclusion of segment attribution. Although this attribution is not entirely accurate, a large majority of the major streams and rivers are labeled correctly. Many attribute errors exist in perennial streams and canal segments within the Arkansas and Mississippi delta areas. (TIGER is a registered trademark of the U.S. Census Bureau)

Lakes

FGDC Metadata

Source: TIGER Line Files (1998)

Data Format: Vector (polygons)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: U.S. Bureau of the Census

Description: This data layer contains all of the 1998 TIGER/Line hydrographic polygons for the State of Arkansas. The file is an extract of the 1998 TIGER/Line files. These data were originally collected from the USGS Digital Line Graph (DLG) data. After review by the source water team, it was determined that these data better represented the nature of the hydrology within Arkansas, than any other readily available data source; regardless of the fact that the other reviewed data were collected at a more accurate scale. The DLG lake polygons contained the most accurate topological structure and therefore made solid fills within the mapping process much simpler.

Public Water System Intakes (PWS)

FGDC Metadata

Source: Determined in the field using GPS or USGS 7.5-minute quads

Data Format: Vector (points)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: Arkansas Department of Health

Description: This data layer illustrates the locations of public water system (PWS) intakes in the State of Arkansas. These locations have been mapped and/or located by the Arkansas Department of Health-Engineering Section staff under the guidance of Lyle Godfrey, using a variety of methods. The PWS locations were mapped between the spring of 1995 until the summer of 1999. The full metadata documentation contains a description of each attribute that was collected for the PWS locations, but the most important to note that these "systems" were classified by type by the Arkansas Department of Health. These types consist of: Surface, Groundater, Spring, and GroundWater Under the Direct Influence of surface water (GWUDI) water source-type. The type of source used for each public water system determined the method for assessment area delineation.

Assessment Areas for each Public Water System Intake

FGDC Metadata

Source: ADH Wellhead Protection Program using various methods

Data Format: Vector (polygons)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: Arkansas Department of Health (ADH), United States Geological Survey

Description: Wells: Well delineation methods are those approved for the Arkansas Well Head Protection Program.

Springs and GWUDI wells: An assessment area was delineated around each spring enclosure or wellhead using the arbitrary fixed radius method of delineation to set the boundary at a radial distance of 0.5 mile around each intake. If a surface water body intersected the base 0.5-mile radius, conjunctive delineations were performed. In such cases the delineation and assessment area was increased to include all area within a radius of 3.0 miles of the intake.

Rivers, Streams and Impoundments: The entire watershed of the drinking water source within the state boundary was delineated. For Rivers / Streams, Assessment Areas included all lands within 0.25 miles of either side of the centerline of the river / stream and of all its tributaries within a 3 day time of travel limited by a maximum distance upstream from the intake of 20 miles.

For Impoundments, Assessment Areas included all lands within a 5-mile radius around the intake that are within 0.25 miles of the shoreline at the impoundment's high water level and within 0.25 miles of either side of the centerline of all tributaries. In addition, all lands within a 0.5-mile radius of the intake, regardless of watershed boundaries are included.

County/State boundaries

FGDC Metadata

Source: TIGER Line Files (1998); modified by CAST

Data Format: Vector (lines)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: U.S. Bureau of the Census; CAST

Description: The file contains the 1998 TIGER/Line county boundaries for the State of Arkansas. The file is an extract of the 1998 TIGER/Line files. TIGER, TIGER/Line, and Census TIGER are registered trademarks of the Bureau of the Census. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county with the coverage area based on January 1, 1998 legal boundaries. The subject file was created using the GIS Tools software product "tgr2shp" to convert the individual county TIGER/Line files to the shapefile format. Using the ESRI software product ArcView 3.2 the individual county files were merged into one file covering the State of Arkansas for database population and subsequent use by the general public.

Railroads

FGDC Metadata

Source: TIGER/Line files (1998); modified by CAST

Data Format: Vector

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: U.S. Bureau of the Census; CAST

Description: The file contains all of the 1998 TIGER/Line railroad links for the State of Arkansas. The file is an extract of the 1998 TIGER/Line files. TIGER, TIGER/Line, and Census TIGER are registered trademarks of the Bureau of the Census. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county with the coverage area based on January 1, 1998 legal boundaries. The subject file was created using the GIS Tools software product "tgr2shp" to convert the individual county TIGER/Line files to "shp" format. Using the ESRI software product ArcView 3.2 the individual county files were merged into one file covering the State of Arkansas for database population and subsequent use for the source water assessment.

Precipitation

FGDC Metadata

Source: PRISM; modified by CAST

Data Format: Vector

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: Oregon State Univ., Oregon Climate Service and CAST

Description: This data layer illustrates average annual precipitation in the State of Arkansas for the climatological period 1961-1990. Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) derived raster data is the underlying data set from which the polygons were created. PRISM is an anlytical model that uses point data and a digital elevation model (DEM) to generate grid estimates of annual, monthly and event-based climatic parameters. Further information on PRISM can be found at: http://www.ocs.orst.edu/prism/prism_new.html

Potential Sources of Contamination (PSOC)

FGDC Metadata

Source: Varies (Click to see table), geocoded/compiled by CAST

Data Format: Vector (points)

Scale: 1:100,000

Source Agency: Various Agencies (Click to see table), CAST

Description: The identification of potential sources of contamination (PSOC) and the where or how to obtain these data was another challenge. A PSOC was defined as; "a contaminant that has the potential to adversely affect the quality of a drinking water supply". An initial list of contaminants was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) web site:

· http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/swp/vcontam3.html

· http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/swp/sources1.html

The Source Water Assessment Team agreed to refine the EPA lists of potential contaminants to fit the conditions found within Arkansas. These PSOCs were assigned a "table code" that indicated the source of the information so that each point location could be merged into one seamless map layer of PSOCs for assessment purposes. These "table codes" ensured that each point would not only have a unique number, but that it could be traced back to the data source. A complete list, including the contact information for organizations that contributed data during the project, is contained in the Appendix of this document.

 

Main Page - Abstract - Introduction - Objectives - Data Layers - Methodology - Products - Web Maps - Appendix - Contact Info - Acknowledgments